Monday, August 24, 2015
dakotadad x-100
A-11
principles. Bryan isn't surprised to see college coaches embracing the A-11.
The offense is based on the same principles of the spread and the
run-and-shoot, finding running lanes and open space. Of the college programs
seeking information on Piedmont's offense, Bryan said about 70 percent of them
run some version of the spread. Talk of the offense began with word of mouth on
the West Coast, then picked up when college recruiters received highlights of
Piedmont games. Media reports during the spring brought more attention to the
offense, presenting Piedmont's coaches with a dilemma - should they share their
creation or guard the company secrets. They decided to share everything. Bryan
and Humphries have fielded phone calls, hosted coaching clinics, sent film all
over the country and established a Web site (a11offense.com) with access to
diagrams and video. Humphries recently completed a comprehensive installation
manual for the offense, as well. "It was bound to happen," Bryan
said. "It's amazing how sincere, how interested and how energetic they've
been about something fresh." - David Fox What developed from that
brainstorming session was the "A-11 offense" - as in all 11 players
potentially are eligible. The base offense is one in which a center and two
tight ends surround the football, three receivers are split right, three more
split left and two quarterbacks stand behind in a shotgun, one of whom has to
be at least 7 yards behind the line of scrimmage. A description on the
offense's Web site - www.a11offense.com - describes it as "an innovative
offense blending aspects of the spread option, West Coast and run and
shoot." Yes, per the rules of the game, only five players are eligible to
catch a pass during a particular play and seven players have to set up on the
line of scrimmage. But in the minds of Bryan and Humphries, you can develop an
infinite number of plays with an infinite number of formations. Talk about
confusing a defense. "It presents a different set of challenges for
defenses because they have to account for which guys go out or might go
out," Bryan said. "Those guys who are ineligible to go down the field
and catch a pass, they can take a reverse pitch or a negative screen or a hitch
behind the line of scrimmage. "We've opened up the game to the extreme
with the rules already in place." First, though, Piedmont coaches had to
make sure this offense was actually legal. Bryan and Humphries scoured the
rulebook, met with league officials and submitted the concept of the offense to
the National Federation of High Schools and the California Interscholastic
Federation. "We had a 99.9 percent feeling that it was legal," Bryan
said. "After it was approved, there was a sense of, 'OK, now what do we
do?' " First, they had to install the offense during spring practice and
during the summer. Bryan said it wasn't pretty. Even into the first two games
of the 2007 season, contests in which the Highlanders lost while scoring a
combined nine points, the coaching staff continued making adjustments. Then,
something clicked and they went on a seven-game winning streak, using the A-11
offense about 60 percent of the time and a more traditional formation the other
40 percent. This season, Bryan said he wants to use the A-11 offense 85-90
percent of the time. "There was a lot of learning, and we put in a lot of
the preparation," Humphries said. "We adapted every week. We learned
from what the competitors were doing against us. We made changes and adjusted
techniques. We saw nine different defenses in 11 games. It was a wealth of
information on what things different defenses can do against this. The
different techniques are invaluable." Now, after a year, Bryan says the
interest level from coaches across the country is high, and Bryan has produced
five instructional videos. Though Bryan admits there probably is some
resistance to this radically different offense, one of his opponents said he
sees nothing wrong with it. "It's pretty trailblazing," said Hayward
(Calif.) Moreau Catholic coach Andrew Cotter, whose squad was pummeled by
Piedmont 47-7 last season. "The fact they came up with the idea - it takes
a lot of work. I don't think they're trying to take an easy way out. "I'm
a new coach coming from an old-school philosophy. Football is meant to line up,
get your hand in the dirt and figure it out. But playing within the rules and
trying to create an advantage is not something I'm against. There is a
philosophy that says you need to line up and see who's the man. However, if
you're not the man, you need to come up with some significant strategies to
counter that." Now, Bryan looks to the future and ponders what this
offense can mean. http://louis-j-sheehan.com "It is limitless," Bryan
said. "Here's what's going to happen. If we were sitting down with
football coaches and players in 50 years or 100 years, the A-11 would be no big
deal because that's what the game will be. "People can laugh at it, but
that's reality." </p> 4495266 2008-07-25 00:51:42 2008-07-25
00:51:42 open open football-4495266 publish 0 0 post 0 http://louis j sheehan.com
left http://Louis9J9Sheehan9esquire.blog.ca/2008/07/23/left-4487723/ Wed, 23
Jul 2008 10:58:04 +0200 Beforethebigbang <p>Anyone who has watched their
fair share of baseball games has heard TV analysts, and probably other fans,
wax ad naseum about strategic match-ups between righties and lefties. No truly
complete lineup, they say, lacks at least one left-handed power hitter. No
bullpen is complete without at least one left-handed relief pitcher to oppose
those left-handed hitters. http://louis-j-sheehan.com But why are there so many
lefties in baseball in the first place? Twenty-five percent of baseball players
are left-handed, as opposed to only 10 percent of the general public. Are
lefties naturally more athletic? http://louis-j-sheehan.com No, says David
Peters from Washington University in St. Louis. Rather, he argues, the science
of the game, right down to the dimensions of the diamond, favors left-handed
people. Consider the following: 1. When a right-handed batter swings, his
momentum takes him toward third base. He has to stop, and then re-start toward
first base. But a lefty’s
swing takes him toward first base, and Peters says that an average lefty
reaches first base one-sixth of a second faster than an average righty, which
could make the difference between a hit and an out. 2. It’s not just the
infield, either. Because of the preponderance of right-handed people, who can’t hit the ball as far
to right field, the outfield fences in historic ballparks like Yankee Stadium
and Fenway Park were built notoriously close to the plate. 3. Left-handed
hitters fair better against righty pitchers, who are the majority, because they
pick up the ball easier. If you’re a right-handed hitter, the pitch looks like it
starts out behind your shoulder. But a lefty sees it in front of him the whole
way. 4. Lefty pitchers stay in demand because they can reverse that visual
effect—left-handed
hitters see the ball start out behind them. But lefty-against-lefty is
additionally troubling for the hitter—because there are fewer total left-handed people in
the world, lefty hitters have less experience against lefty pitchers, and end
up taking some goofy-looking swings. 5. Left-handed pitchers face first base,
making it easier to hold runners close to the bag or pick them off. Overall,
the odds of any one person making it to the Major Leagues are remote. But if
you’re
born left-handed, consider it a leg up. That is, unless you want to play
catcher. Then forget it.</p> 4487723 2008-07-23 10:58:04 2008-07-23
10:58:04 open open left-4487723 publish 0 0 post 0 http://louis j sheehan.com
cytosol http://Louis9J9Sheehan9esquire.blog.ca/2008/07/18/cytosol-4465611/ Fri,
18 Jul 2008 15:59:20 +0200 Beforethebigbang <p>Cells come in different
shapes and sizes. But how is cell shape determined? And does shape have a role
in the regulation of signalling? http://louis-j-sheehan.com Julie Theriot and
colleagues used motile epithelial keratocytes derived from fish skin to address
the first question. Keratocyte shapes were described by four primary shape
modes: cell area, 'D' versus 'canoe' shape, cell-body position and left–right asymmetry.
Measurements of cell motility, surface area and other morphological features in
a large number of cells, and examination of the distribution of actin filaments
along the leading edge to relate the cell-shape measures with cellular actin
dynamics, revealed that cell shape is dynamically determined. Cell morphology
perturbation studies indicated that cell shape and motility depend on a
cellular history-independent, self-organizing mechanism that is characterized
by a small number of cellular parameters that stay constant over time (such as
the available quantities of membrane or cytoskeletal components).
http://louis-j-sheehan.com The authors next developed a quantitative physical
model of cell shape and movement that could explain the main features of
keratocyte shapes. Based on the findings that the surface area is constant and
that the density of filamentous actin along the leading edge is graded, and
based on previous observations that showed that the lamellipodial actin network
undergoes treadmilling with net assembly at the leading edge and net
disassembly towards the rear, Theriot and colleagues propose a model in which
actin-network treadmilling drives from within the forward protrusion of an
inextensible membrane bag (characterized in two dimensions by its total surface
area). This model can quantitatively recapitulate the range of keratocyte
shapes and predict both cell shape and motility. The second question concerns
the relevance of cell shape for cellular functions. An emerging concept
proposes that cell signalling is nonhomogeneous in space and that
spatiotemporal dynamics of signalling molecule activities create a code that
confers signalling specificity. Iyengar and colleagues used computational and
experimental approaches to model the flow of spatial information from
beta-adrenergic receptors (beta-ARs) to mitogen-activated protein kinase (MAPK)
in neurons in vivo. In hippocampal neurons, the cell body and dendrites have
the same surface density of beta-ARs, generating similar adenyl cyclase
activities and cyclic AMP (cAMP) levels near the cell surface. cAMP gradients
arise from the spatial segregation of adenylyl cyclase activities and
phosphodiesterase in the cytosol. Numerical simulations indicate a gradient
decay length of sim4 µm that can decrease to sim2.5 µm when phosphodiesterase
is activated. In the neuronal soma (20–30 µm diameter), cAMP becomes progressively
hydrolysed as distance from the cell membrane increases. By contrast, in the
dendrite, cAMP can remain high because of its small diameter (1–4 µm). Interestingly,
similar phenomena occur in migrating cells, in which protrusions such as
filopodia and lamellipodia at the leading edge are much thinner than the cell
body and trailing edge. Signalling molecules, such as the GTPase CDC42, become
preferentially activated in the leading edge, where the surface-to-volume ratio
is increased. Ravi Iyengar and colleagues also addressed how spatial heterogeneity
affects the propagation of the input signal to downstream effectors and how
network design is linked to the spatial code implemented by signalling
microdomains. Their results indicate that cell shape controls the dynamics of
local biochemical activity of negative regulators to determine the size of
signalling microdomains, and that negative regulators control the flow of
spatial information to downstream components within the cell.</p> 4465611
2008-07-18 15:59:20 2008-07-18 15:59:20 open open cytosol-4465611 publish 0 0
post 0 invitrogen
http://Louis9J9Sheehan9esquire.blog.ca/2008/07/13/invitrogen-4441167/ Sun, 13
Jul 2008 09:51:01 +0200 Beforethebigbang 4441167 2008-07-13 09:51:01 2008-07-13
09:51:01 open open invitrogen-4441167 publish 0 0 post 0 methane
http://Louis9J9Sheehan9esquire.blog.ca/2008/07/12/methane-4436887/ Sat, 12 Jul
2008 01:02:28 +0200 Beforethebigbang <p>The Earth was an inhospitable
place 635 million years ago, when ice sheets that extended to the equator.
Scientists have long wondered how the planet rebounded from that icy era, known
as “Snowball
Earth.”
Now a new study suggests that a stream of methane gas escaping from the ice
brought the planet to a climate tipping point and transformed it into a lush,
tropical world, in what researchers called one of the most severe climate
change events recorded in Earth history. Paleoclimatology has become a hot
field, as researchers believe that the planet’s dramatic prehistoric
climate shifts can help predict the effects of present-day global warming.
Since methane figures into one of the most ominous global warming scenarios,
this latest study is being eagerly scrutinized for clues to our planet’s fate. On Snowball
Earth, methane was trapped in the ice sheets. But ice sheets are inherently
unstable. Once they reach a certain size, they begin to fall apart. The
collapse of ancient ice sheets at the Equator would have unleashed trapped
methane deposits and pushed global temperatures higher. Methane, a powerful
greenhouse gas, then raised temperatures, leading to more collapsing ice sheets
in a looping feedback cycle. Climate researchers point out that vast amounts of
methane are now trapped in the permafrost and buried in icy deposits beneath
the ocean floors. This latest study suggests that a warmer climate and oceans
could thaw those deposits, and allow the methane to bubble up into the
atmosphere. If global temperatures continue to rise, massive amounts of methane
gas could be released from the 10,000 gigaton reserves of frozen methane that
are currently locked in the world’s deep oceans and permafrost. Passing this climate
tipping point would result in global warming that would be far worse and more
rapid than scientists’
current estimates. …
The study’s
lead author suggests it could happen fast — not over thousands or millions of years, but
possibly within a century. http://Louis-J-sheehan.info “This is a major
concern because it’s
possible that only a little warming can unleash this trapped methane,” Martin Kennedy, a
professor at UC Riverside, said in a release. “Unzippering the methane
reservoir could potentially warm the Earth tens of degrees, and the mechanism
could be geologically very rapid” . Kennedy’s predictions on the potential timescale of the
methane release are the most alarming to date; other researchers have predicted
that it would take thousands of years for methane to be released from the
oceans. But most climate researchers would probably agree with Kennedy’s preventative,
prophylactic advice: Keep it zipped! In 2007, excavators of a remote site in
southeastern Iran reported finding evidence of a writing system that dates back
more than 4,000 years. Featuring odd geometric symbols, three baked mud tablets
unearthed near the Iranian city of –Jiroft could reveal much about a sophisticated and
independent urban culture that flourished between the Mesopotamian and Indus
Valley civilizations. However, many scholars are skeptical about the
authenticity of the finds, which they –suspect may have been planted by locals.
Archaeologists first began digging at large mounds near Jiroft in 2001 after
flash floods uncovered ancient graves nearby. The team has since found evidence
of a large city dating to 2500 B.C. Then, in 2005, a worker brought Yousef
Madjidzadeh, the archaeologist in charge of the excavation, a tablet covered
with strange symbols on the front and back, saying he dug it up in his village
a few hundred yards away. Last winter, Madjidzadeh ordered his team to dig at
the spot, where they uncovered two more tablets. The three appear to show a
progression: The first has 8 simple geometric signs; the second includes 15
slightly more complex signs, while the third has a total of 59 signs. The
variants might be precursors to Elamite, the writing system used on the Iranian
plateau in the late third millennium B.C. They could also be unrelated or, as
some have said, fakes. Madjidzadeh vows to return in 2008 to uncover more
tablets and silence his critics. http://louis-j-sheehan.biz That the warrior
survived the arrow’s
strike for even a short time was remarkable. The triple-barbed arrowhead,
probably launched by an opponent on horseback, shattered bone below his right
eye and lodged firmly in his flesh. The injury wasn’t the man’s first brush with
death. In his youth he had survived a glancing sword blow that fractured the
back of his skull. This injury was different. The man was probably begging for
death, says Michael Schultz, a paleopathologist at the University of Göttingen.
Holding the victim’s
skull in one hand and a replica of the deadly arrow in the other, Schultz
paints a picture of a crude operation that took place on the steppes of Siberia
2,600 years ago. “The
man was crying, ‘Help
me,’”
Schultz–
says. Thin cuts on the bone show how his companions cut away his cheek, then
used a small saw to remove pieces of bone, but to no avail. Pointing to a crack
in the skull, he describes the next agonizing step: An ancient surgeon smashed
into the bone with a chisel in a final, futile effort to free the arrowhead. “Hours or a day later,
the man died,”
Schultz says. “It
was torture.”
The slain warrior’s
remains were found in 2003, buried with those of 40 others in a massive kurgan,
or grave mound, in southern Siberia at a site that archaeologists call Arzhan
2. To find out more about the lives and deaths of these ancient people, Schultz
has spent years teasing out the secrets of their bones, using techniques like
those employed at crime scenes. In April he announced the results of his
research on the wounded warrior. His body, Schultz says, bore some of the
earliest evidence of battlefield surgery. (Prior to this announcement, in
October 2007, Schultz had reported a finding on a prince buried at the center
of the Arzhan 2 mound. Using a scanning electron microscope, Schultz found
signs of prostate cancer in the prince’s skeleton. This is the earliest documentation of
the disease.) The Arzhan 2 skeletons, which belong to warrior-nomads the
ancient Greeks called Scythians, are part of a spectacular series of finds in
remote sites in central Asia. One of the discoveries dates back to the 1940s
when mummies were found in the Altai Mountains, which run through Siberia and
Mongolia. Later, after the fall of the Soviet Union, when some of the sites
became more accessible for excavation, the pace of Scythian-related discoveries
picked up. The warrior skeleton Schultz is talking about, for example, was
found on a plain not far from the 1940s discovery. More recently, other
well-preserved mummies—not
skeletons—have
been found at altitudes of 8,000 feet in the valleys of the Altai Mountains.
Still other discoveries have been made on the coast of the Black Sea and the
edge of China. Together, the evidence illuminates aspects of the Scythians’ unusual culture,
from tattooing warriors to creating intricate metalwork. Never constituting an
empire, the Scythians were a network of culturally similar tribes that ranged
from Siberia to Egypt almost 3,000 years ago and faded away around A.D. 100.
The Greek historian Herodotus describes the Scythians as murderous nomads. As
for how the Scythians—who
did not have a written language—perceived themselves, only their artifacts and
human remains are left to speak for them. +++ For Hermann Parzinger, the
49-year-old German archaeologist who excavated the tombs of the wounded warrior
and the cancerous prince, the Scythians have been an obsession.
http://Louis-J-Sheehan.de Even so, he and his Russian colleague Konstantin
Chugonov were surprised to find that the grave mound contained the bodies of 26
men and women, most of them apparently executed to follow the ruler into the
afterlife. One woman’s
skull had been pierced four times with a war pick; another man’s skull still had
splinters in it from the wooden club used to kill him. The skeletons of 14
horses were arranged in the grave. More impressive was the discovery of 5,600
gold objects, including an intricate necklace weighing three pounds and a cloak
studded with 2,500 small gold panthers. After the Arzhan 2 finds, Parzinger—who until this year
headed the German Archaeological Institute—was tantalized by the possibility of finding a
well-preserved mummy that would give archaeologists and pathologists insights
into the Scythian culture that bare skeletons never could. “High in the
mountains, you can find remains in a preserved condition that just doesn’t exist in other
places,”
Parzinger, now head of the Prussian Cultural Heritage Foundation in Berlin,
says. “Instead
of archaeology, it’s
a kind of ethnography.”
In the summer of 2006, his search took him to a windswept plain in the Altai
Mountain range that is peppered with Scythian grave mounds. Parzinger worried
that mummies in the highlands may not be around much longer, as global warming
reverses the chill that has preserved them for millennia. A team of Russian
geophysicists had surveyed the area in 2005, using ground-penetrating radar to
look for telltale underground ice. Their data suggested that four mounds could
contain some sort of frozen tomb. Parzinger assembled 28 researchers from
Mongolia, Germany, and Russia to open the mounds, on the banks of the
Olon-Kurin-Gol River in Mongolia. The first two mounds took three weeks to
excavate and yielded nothing significant. A third had been cleaned out by grave
robbers centuries earlier. The radar data for the fourth mound—barely a bump on the
plain, just a few feet high and 40 feet across—were ambiguous at best. But
a thrill went through the team as they dug into it. Buried under four and a
half feet of stone and earth was a felt-lined chamber made of larch logs.
Inside was a warrior in full regalia, his body partially mummified by the
frozen ground. +++ Researchers recovered the mummy intact, along with his
clothes, weapons, tools, and even the meal intended to sustain him in the
afterlife. He shared his grave with two horses in full harness, slaughtered and
arranged facing northeast. Mongolia’s president lent the team his personal helicopter
to shuttle the finds to a lab in the country’s capital, Ulaanbaatar. The mummy’s body spent a year
in Germany; his clothes and gear are at a lab in Novosibirsk, Russia. Before
Parzinger opened his grave, the warrior had lain for more than 2,000 years on
an ice lens, a sheet of ice created by water seeping through the grave and
freezing against the permafrost below. The mummy “had been dehydrated, or
desiccated, by the ice in the grave,” Schultz says. Scythian mummies show signs of
primitive embalming: Internal organs were removed and replaced with grasses,
for instance. The combination of ice and intentional preservation resulted in
remarkably resilient specimens. When Schultz shows me the mummy, housed in the
same lab as the skeleton of the wounded warrior, the temperature is a
comfortable 70 degrees, and sunlight streams onto its leathery flesh. The mummy’s facial features
were destroyed. But in this instance—unlike the case of the wounded warrior skeleton—the destruction was
inflicted by nature. When the ice lens formed under the burial chamber, it
expanded upward. “The
extent of the ice was so high, the body was pressed against the logs on the
ceiling and smashed,”
Schultz says. The skull shattered, making facial reconstruction impossible. His
chest, too, was crushed. Still, a lot can be learned. “You can establish a
kind of biography from the body,” Schultz says. He notes that the mummy’s teeth are
surrounded by pitted bone—evidence
of painful gum disease, probably the result of a diet rich in meat and dairy
but lacking in fruits and vegetables. Between 60 and 65 years old when he died,
the man was slim and just about 5 feet 2 inches. At some point he had broken
his left arm, perhaps in a fall. His vertebrae show signs of osteo–arthritis from years
of pounding in the saddle. Badly worn arm and shoulder joints testify to heavy
use. “That
kind of osteo–arthritis
and joint damage is very characteristic if you handle wild horses,” Schultz says. The
clues reinforce what Parzinger and others have suspected: He belonged to the
Scythians, a seminomadic culture that once dominated the steppes of Siberia,
central Asia, and eastern Europe. http://www.myspace.com/louis_j_sheehan_esquire
Beginning around 800 B.C., the Scythians thundered across the central Asian
steppes, and within a few generations, their art and culture had spread far
beyond the steppes of central Asia. The Scythians’ exploits struck fear into
the hearts of the ancient Greeks and Persians. Herodotus wrote about their
violent burial customs, including human sacrifice (which the Arzhan 2 find
tends to confirm) and drug-fueled rituals. He speculated that they came from
mountains far to the east, in the “land of the gold-guarding griffins.” Archaeologists say
the Scythians’
Bronze Age ancestors were livestock breeders living in the highlands where
modern-day Russia, Mongolia, China, and Kazakhstan intersect. Then “something changed,” Par–zinger says.
Beginning around 1000 B.C., a wetter climate may have created grassy steppes
that could support huge herds of horses, sheep, and goats. People took to
horseback to follow the roaming herds. Around 800 B.C., all traces of
settlements vanish from the archaeological record. Archaeologists usually draw
their clues from ordinary artifacts and human remains, so while the grave gold
from the nomadic Scythians is sumptuous, the real prize is the ancient people
themselves. A century of digging at lower altitudes and in the warm Ukrainian
plains rarely yielded more than skeletons or jewelry. In the late 1940s, Soviet
archaeologist Sergei Rudenko traveled to the Pazyryk region of the Altai
Mountains and made some stunning finds. Richly appointed wooden chambers contained
well-preserved mummies, their skin covered in elaborate, twisting animal
tattoos. Their brains, intestines, and other organs had been removed and the
corpses sewn up with horsehair. The dead had been dressed, armed, and laid to
rest in chambers lined with felt blankets, wool carpets, and slaughtered
horses. In 1992 Russian archaeologists began a new search for ice lenses—and mummies. Natalya
Polosmak, an archaeologist in Novosibirsk, discovered the coffin of an
elaborately tattooed “ice
princess”
with clothes of Chinese silk at Ak-Alakha, another site in the Altai Mountains.
Other finds in this area included a burial chamber with two coffins. One coffin
contained a man, the other a woman armed with a dagger, war pick, bow, and
arrow-filled quiver. She wore trousers instead of a skirt. The find lent
credence to some scholars’
suggestions of a link between the Scythians and the legendary Amazons. In the
early 1990s, just a few miles from that site, Parzinger’s partner Vyacheslav
Molodin uncovered the more modest mummy of a young, blond warrior. The burial
style resembled that of Parzinger’s mummy, the one found at the Olon-Kurin-Gol River
whose face was crushed by ice. Parzinger fears global warming may soon put an
end to the search for Scythians. Rudenko’s dig diaries contain reports of weather far colder
than what modern archaeologists experience in the Altai. “When you read
descriptions from the 1940s and compare them with the climate of today, you don’t need to be a
scientist to see there’s
been a change,”
Parzinger says. Geographer Frank Lehmkuhl from the University of Aachen in
Germany has been studying lake levels in the Altai region for a decade. “According to our
research, the glaciers are retreating and the lake levels are rising,” Lehmkuhl says. With
no increase in the region’s
rainfall, the change “can
only come from melting permafrost and glaciers.” As the permafrost thaws,
the ice that has preserved the Scythian mummies for so many centuries will thaw
too. In the Olon-Kurin-Gol grave, the ice that once crushed the mummy against
the roof of the burial chamber had receded nine inches by the time the chamber
was opened. Within a few decades, the ice lenses may be completely gone. “Right now we’re facing a rescue
archaeology situation,”
Parzinger says. “It’s hard to say how
much longer these graves will be there.” Neanderthals don’t have the best reputation.
In the public mind, the heavy-browed hominids are thought of as a stupid
species that couldn’t
compete with brighter Homo sapiens, as the also-rans that therefore went
extinct. But a newly discovered trove of Neanderthal tools in Sussex, England
may help rehabilitate their image. The tools, which date from the end of the
Neanderthal era at around 30,000 B.C., show surprising sophistication, archaeologists
say. “The
tools we’ve
found at the site are technologically advanced and potentially older than tools
in Britain belonging to our own species,” said [University College London]’s Matthew Pope.
http://members.greenpeace.org/blog/purposeforporpoise “It’s exciting to think
that there’s
a real possibility these were left by some of the last Neanderthal hunting
groups to occupy northern Europe,” he added. “The impression they give is of a population in
complete command of both landscape and natural raw materials with a flourishing
technology —
not a people on the edge of extinction”. The research team announced that the collection
of flint tools were found at a site called Beedings on a hilltop that may have
had strategic value for the huntsmen, as it would have provided an excellent
view of game herds on the surrounding plains. The tools might have been used to
hunt the horses, woolly mammoths, and woolly rhinoceros that roamed the British
isles at the time. The tools themselves are more than just crude blunt
instruments, Pope says. “Unlike
earlier, more typical Neanderthal tools these were made with long, straight
blades - blades which were then turned into a variety of bone and hide
processing implements, as well as lethal spear points” [said Pope]…. Towards the end of
their time in Europe, between 30-40,000 years ago (probably including the time
period of British sites such as Kent’s Cavern in Devon, and Beedings), the Neanderthals
diversified their tool-making, showing that they were adapting in new ways,
possibly in reaction to the presence of incoming modern human populations (the
Cro-Magnons) in adjoining regions of continental Europe. The Beedings site has
been known about for more than a century, but the artifacts found there weren’t always treated with
the proper respect. Some 2,300 stone tools were first uncovered at the start of
the 20th Century when the foundations were being dug for a huge new house to be
built at Beedings. But for many years, the tools were considered to be fakes.
All but a few hundred of them were thrown down a well and never seen again [BBC
News]. The newly excavated tools lend the earlier batch credibility, as
researchers can demonstrate that these tools are similar in composition and
style to Neaderthal tools found in northern Europe that were made between
35,000 and 42,000 years ago. A clump of hair that lay frozen in the Greenland
tundra for 4,000 years has yielded DNA from the earliest Arctic residents, and
offers clues to their origins. Researchers have long wondered who those rugged
settlers were, and where they came from. Were they part of a massive migration
that swept through all of North America, or were they a separate tribe that
eventually gave rise to Greenland’s present-day Eskimos? Until now, no ancient human
remains had been found in that harsh climate to allow researchers to study the
genetics of those “Paleo-Eskimos.” But the new
discovery sheds some light on the people, and suggests that neither of the
earlier theories is correct; in fact, they were a distinct tribe that journeyed
all the way from Siberia to Greenland, but didn’t stick around to populate
the frozen north. The trove of information came from an unassuming source. The
ancient clump of hair looks like something you’d sweep off a barbershop
floor. “It’s kind of brown, got
a bit of dirt in it, a bit of twigs, but … it looks [in] remarkably good condition,” says biologist
Thomas Gilbert of the University of Copenhagen. University of Copenhagen
researchers had spent months in Greenland trying to find human remains, with no
success. They then learned of this hair sample, which was discovered in the
1980s in Disko Bay, in western Greenland, and was being kept in a museum
collection. Gilbert’s
team was able to isolate the sample’s mitochondrial DNA, which is passed down from
mother to child and therefore offers a genetic marker of maternal lineage. When
they compared the DNA from the hair to DNA from other populations, they
realized that the Paleo-Eskimos were not genetically similar to Native Americans,
but they did have much in common with residents of the westernmost Aleutian
Islands and Siberia. According to the research team’s report in Science,
subscription required, this suggests that the ancient Eskimos migrated from
East Asia via the Bering Strait land bridge. But Greenland’s modern Eskimos aren’t genetically similar
to those early residents either, indicating that they couldn’t last in that icy
environment. Lead author Gilbert and colleagues suggest that past ancient
Eskimo populations succumbed to periods of climate cooling. “Obviously it’s an extremely tough
environment up there, and it may be that the environments got so harsh that the
populations got smaller and smaller and collapsed,” he said.
Futurologists envision a world a million years from now in which the entire
solar system has been turned into computronium and nanobots transform our
garbage into foie gras. But in my experience, the repeated sin of futurologists
is that they often extrapolate from what is new rather than from what is old.
Computers and nanotechnology, impressive though they are, are things of
relatively recent origin. As such, they are unlikely to be around for very
long. To find something that will pretty certainly endure into the distant
future, we are obliged, paradoxically enough, to go back much farther into the
past. And if we could cast a look back several million years, we would see,
among other things, laughter and numbers. So we can be pretty confident that
laughter and numbers will survive long after most of what we’re familiar with is
gone. The insight that old things tend to last and new things tend to disappear
flows from the Copernican principle. This principle says, in essence, “You’re not special.” Before Copernicus,
we imagined that we occupied a very special place at the center of the
universe. Now we know better: We are on an average planet in an average galaxy
in an average cluster. But the Copernican principle applies to time as well as
to space. If there is nothing special about our perspective, we are unlikely to
be observing any given thing at the very beginning or the very end of its
existence. And that rather obvious point can lead to some interesting
predictions. Consider the longevity of the human race. If there is nothing
special about the moment at which we observe our species, then it is 95 percent
certain that we are seeing Homo sapiens in the middle 95 percent of its
existencenot
the first fortieth (21⁄2 percent) or the last fortieth (21⁄2 percent). Humans
have already been around for about 200,000 years. That means we can, with 95
percent confidence, expect the species to endure for at least another 5,100
years (1/39 x 200,000) but for no more than 7.8 million years (39 x 200,000).
It was Richard Gott III, an astrophysicist at Princeton University, who
pioneered this sort of reasoning. In a paper published in Nature on May 27,
1993, “Implications
of the Copernican Principle for Our Future Prospects,” Gott noted that the
Copernican-based calculation gives H. sapiens an expected total longevity
comparable to that of other hominid species (H. erectus lasted 1.6 million
years) and of mammal species in general (whose average span is 2 million
years). It also gives us a decent shot at being around a million years from
now. What else might be around in the Year Million? Consider something of
recent origin, like the Internet. The Internet has existed for about 25 years
now (as I learned by going on the Internet and looking at Wikipedia). By
Copernican reasoning, this means we can be 95 percent certain that it will
continue to be around for another seven-plus months but that it will disappear
within 975 years. So in the Year Million, there will almost certainly be
nothing recognizable as the Internet. (This is, perhaps, not a terribly
surprising conclusion.) Ditto for baseball. Ditto for what we call industrial
technology, which, having come into existence a little more than two centuries
ago, is likely to be superseded by something strange and new in the next 10,000
years. Laughter and numbers, on the other hand, are good bets to survive a
million years because they are two of the oldest things that are part of our
lives today. http://louis2j2sheehan2esquire.blog.ca How do we know this?
Because we share both laughter and a sense of number with other species, and
therefore with common ancestors that existed millions of years ago. Take
laughter. Chimpanzees laugh. Charles Darwin, in The Expression of the Emotions
in Man and Animals, noted that “if a young chimpanzee be tickled—the armpits are
particularly sensitive to tickling, as in the case of our children—a more decided
chuckling or laughing sound is uttered; though the laughter is sometimes
noiseless.”
Actually, what primatologists call chimp laughter is more like a breathy pant.
It is evoked not only by tickling but also by rough-and-tumble play, games of
chasing, and mock attacks—just
as with children prior to the emergence of verbal joking at age 5 or 6. The
human and chimpanzee lineages split off from each other between 5 million and 7
million years ago. On the reasonable assumption that chimp and human laughter
are homologous rather than independently evolved traits, laughter must be at
least 5 million to 7 million years old. (It is probably much older; orangutans
also laugh, and their lineage diverged from ours about 14 million years ago.)
So, by the Copernican principle, laughter is quite likely to be around in the
Year Million. Now take numbers. Chimps can do elementary arithmetic, and they
have even been trained to use symbols like numerals to reason about quantity.
But the sense of number is not confined to primates. Animals as diverse as
salamanders, pigeons, raccoons, dolphins, and parrots have the ability to
perceive and represent numbers. A few years ago, researchers at MIT discovered
that macaque monkeys had specialized “number neurons” in the brain region that corresponds to the human
number module. Evidently the number sense has an even longer evolutionary
history than laughter. So again, by the Copernican principle, we can be quite
certain that numbers will be around in the Year Million. But what will our
descendants’
mathematics look like? And what will make them laugh? The first question might
seem the easier to answer. Mathematics, after all, is supposed to be the most
universal aspect of human civilization, the part we assume would extend even to
intelligent life elsewhere in the cosmos. In Carl Sagan’s science fiction
novel Contact, aliens in the vicinity of the star Vega beam a series of prime
numbers toward Earth. The book’s heroine, who works for SETI (Search for
Extraterrestrial Intelligence), realizes with a frisson that the prime-number
pulses her radio telescope is picking up must be generated by some form of
intelligent life. But if the aliens beamed their jokes at us instead, we probably
wouldn’t
be able to distinguish them from the background noise. Indeed, sometimes we can
barely distinguish the jokes in a Shakespeare play from the background noise.
Just as nothing is more timeless than number, nothing is more parochial and
ephemeral than humor, the core of laughter—or so we imagine. We are confident that a
civilization a million years more advanced than our own would find our concept
of number intelligible (and we, theirs), but our jokes would have them
scratching their heads in puzzlement. +++ That is how we see matters at the
moment. In the Year Million, though, I think the perspective will be precisely
the reverse. Humor will be esteemed as the most universal aspect of culture.
And number will have lost its transcendental reputation and be looked upon as a
local artifact, like a computer operating system or an accounting scheme. If I
am right, then SETI scientists should not be listening for primes but for
something quite different. Prime numbers—the numbers that can’t be split up into smaller
factors and are thus the atoms of arithmetic—have an almost holy status today. What makes them
seem transhuman to us now is their sheer orneriness. There are infinitely many
of them, and they seem to crop up almost at random among the rest of the
numbers. “There
is no apparent reason why one number is prime and another not,” the mathematician
Don Zagier declared in his inaugural lecture at Bonn University in 1975.
http://louis6j6sheehan.blogspot.com “To the contrary, upon looking at these numbers, one
has the feeling of being in the presence of one of the inexplicable secrets of
creation.”
But the prime numbers are not really as transcendental as all that. They do
obey a law. We just don’t
grasp the law—yet.
In 1859 the German mathematician Bernhard Riemann put forward what is now
almost universally regarded as the greatest unsolved problem in mathematics:
the Riemann hypothesis. This hypothesis holds the key to the primes’ true pattern, and
once its truth or falsity is resolved, prime numbers will be rendered
transparent to our understanding. How long must we wait? Mathematicians great
and not so great have been trying to crack this nut ever since Riemann put it
out there. “It
will be another million years at least,” the late number theorist Paul Erdös pronounced, “before we understand
the primes.”
The Copernican principle yields a rather different estimate. The Riemann
conjecture has been open since it was first posed 149 years ago. That means we
can be 95 percent certain that it will survive as an open problem for at least
another four years or so (1/39 x 149) but that it will be dispatched within the
next six millennia ?(39 x 149), well short of the Year Million. When it is
solved, the prime numbers will finally be stripped of their cosmic otherness.
We will realize that, like the rest of mathematics, they are man-made, a
terrestrial artifact. They will seem about as trivial as a game of tic-tac-toe.
And how about laughter? Perhaps the best way to gauge future humor is to look
at other primates: What do chimps find funny? The Central Washington University
researcher Roger Fouts reported that Washoe, a chimpanzee who was taught sign
language, once urinated on him while riding on his shoulders. The chimp snorted
and made the sign for “funny.” Washoe was also
observed playfully wielding a toothbrush as if it were a hairbrush. Moja,
another of Fouts’s
signing chimps, called a purse a “shoe” and wore it on her foot. A signing gorilla trained
by another researcher appeared to derive amusement from offering rocks to
people as “food.” Such supposed
instances of simian humor (similar to the jokes of preschool children) involve
the deliberate misnaming or misuse of things. They thus fit nicely under one of
the three classic theories of humor, the incongruity theory, which holds that
mirth results when two things normally kept in separate compartments of the
mind are abruptly and surprisingly yanked together. But why should the
perception of incongruity cause a spasm of noisy chest-heaving? Laughter has
long been viewed as a so-called luxury reflex, one that serves no obvious
evolutionary purpose. In recent years, though, practitioners of the art of
evolutionary psychology have been more imaginative in coming up with Darwinian
rationales. One of the more seductive comes from the neuroscientist V. S.
Ramachandran of the University of California at San Diego, who has advanced
what might be called the false-alarm theory of laughter. A seemingly
threatening situation presents itself; you go into fight-or-flight mode; the
threat proves spurious; you alert your (genetically close-knit) social group to
the absence of actual danger by emitting a stereotyped vocalization —one that is amplified
as it passes contagiously from member to member. Once the mechanism of laughter
was set in place by evolution, the theory goes, it could be hijacked for other
purposes: the expression of contempt for out-groups (as the superiority theory
of humor claims) or the ventilation of forbidden sexual impulses (the relief
theory of humor). But at the core of the original false-alarm mechanism of
laughter is incongruity: the incongruity of a grave threat revealing itself to
be trivial—–or,
as the philosopher Immanuel Kant (an advocate of the incongruity theory) put
it, “the
sudden transformation of a strained expectation into nothing.” Incongruity is
arguably the primeval kernel of laughter. And therefore, by the Copernican
principle, it is likely to be the kernel of laughter in the Year Million. That
is why I think humor and mathematics will ultimately switch places, so to
speak. The transcendence that numbers seem to possess arises from mere kinks in
our local understanding, kinks that will eventually get straightened out. But
the essence of humor is the dialectic between something and nothing, the most
universal categories of all. And what will jokes look like in the Year Million?
We will laugh when incongruity is resolved in a clever way, when a
strange-seeming something is exposed as a trivial nothing—when a proof of the
Riemann hypothesis dissolves the Platonic otherness of the primes into obvious
tautology, and what is today regarded as the hardest problem ever conceived by
the human mind becomes a somewhat broad joke, fit for schoolchildren. We might
laugh even harder at the thought that the end of the universe—its disappearance in
a Big Crunch or expansion into dilute nothingness—itself has the logical form
of a joke. http://louis1j1sheehan.us Stack was born in Los Angeles, California
but spent his early childhood growing up in Europe. He became fluent in French
and Italian at an early age, but he did not learn English until returning to
Los Angeles. Raised by his mother, Mary Elizabeth (née Wood), Stack's parents
divorced when Stack was one and his father, James Langford Stack, a wealthy advertising
agency owner, died when Stack was nine. Stack always spoke of his mother with
the greatest respect and love. When he wrote his autobiography Straight
Shooting, he included a picture of him and his mother. He captioned it "Me
and my best girl." Stack's grandfather was an opera singer from Illinois
named Charles Wood, who went by the name Modini. By the time he reached 20
Stack achieved minor fame as a sportsman. Robert Stack was an avid polo player.
He and his brother won the International Outboard Motor Championships in
Venice, and at the age of 16 he became a member of the All American Skeet Team.
He set two world records in skeet shooting and became National Champion. In
1971 he was inducted into the National Skeet Shooting Hall of Fame. [edit] Career
Stack took drama courses at the University of Southern California. His deep
voice and good looks attracted producers in Hollywood. When Stack visited the
set of Universal Studios at age 20, producer Joe Pasternak offered him an
opportunity to enter the business. Recalled Stack, "He said 'How'd you
like to be in pictures? We'll make a test with Helen Parrish, a little love
scene.' Helen Parrish was a beautiful girl. 'Gee, that sounds keen,' I told
him. I got the part." Stack's first film, which teamed him with Deanna
Durbin, was First Love in 1939. He was the first actor to give Durbin an
on-screen kiss. As hard as it is to believe today, this film was considered
controversial at the time. Stack won acclaim for his next role, 1940's The
Mortal Storm. He played a young man who joins the Nazi party. This film was one
of the first to speak out against Hitler. As a youth, Stack admitted that he
had a crush on Carole Lombard and in 1942 he appeared with her in To Be or Not
To Be. He admitted he was terrified going into this role. He credits Lombard
with giving him many tips on acting and with being his mentor. Lombard was
killed in a plane crash shortly before the film was released. During World War
II, Stack served as gunnery instructor in the United States Navy. He continued
his movie career and appeared in such films as Fighter Squadron (1948), A Date
with Judy (1948) and Bwana Devil (1952). In 1954, Stack was given his most
important movie role. He appeared opposite John Wayne in The High and the
Mighty. Stack played the pilot of an airliner who comes apart under stress
after the airliner encounters engine trouble. In 1957, Stack was nominated for
an Academy Award for Best Supporting Actor for Written on the Wind. He starred
in more than 40 films. Known for his steadfast, humorless demeanor, he made fun
of his own persona in comedies such as 1941 (1979), Airplane! (1980),
Caddyshack II (1988), and BASEketball (1998). He also provided the voice for
the character Ultra Magnus in Transformers: The Movie (1986). Stack depicted
the crimefighting Eliot Ness in the television drama The Untouchables from 1959
to 1963. The show portrayed the ongoing battle between gangsters and federal
agents in a Prohibition-era Chicago. The show brought Stack a best actor Emmy
Award in 1960. The Untouchables was a "realistic" cop show, in the
tradition of Dragnet. Stack also starred in three other series, rotating the
lead with Tony Franciosa and Gene Barry in the lavish The Name of the Game
(1968-1971), Most Wanted, (1976) and Strike Force (1981).
http://ljsheehan.livejournal.com Interestingly, in The Name of the Game, he
played a former federal agent turned true-crime journalist, evoking memories of
his role as Ness. In both Most Wanted and Strike Force he played a tough,
incorruptible police captain commanding an elite squad of special
investigators, also evoking the Ness role. Eventually, he would reprise the
role in a 1992 TV movie, The Return of Eliot Ness. He began hosting Unsolved
Mysteries in 1988, where his serious, ominous voice and stoic facial
expressions lent an authentic gravitas to the program's dark subject matter.
Reportedly, he had an enormous interest in the unexplained—psychic phenomena,
ghosts and the like—because
he himself had had an unusual experience of this nature. However, he also said
that he valued the storytellers above the stories themselves and did not
necessarily believe every case of this nature that he presented. He thought
very highly of the interactive nature of the show, saying that it created a "symbiotic"
relationship between viewer and program, and that the hotline was a great
crime-solving tool. Unsolved Mysteries aired from 1988 to 2002, first on NBC
from 1987 as specials (Stack did not host all the specials), then as a series
from 1988-97, then on CBS (1997-99) and finally on Lifetime in 2001-02. Stack
served as the show's host during its entire series run. Stack had undergone
radiation therapy for prostate cancer in October 2002. He died of heart failure
at his home in Los Angeles On May 14, 2003. Actress Rosemarie Bowe was married
to Stack from 1956 until his death in 2003. Stack was the great-uncle of actor
Taran Killam. He is interred in the Westwood Village Memorial Park Cemetery in
Westwood, California. Rosemarie Bowe was crowned Miss Tomica and Miss Montana
in 1950. In May 1951 Bowe competed in a contest to choose the queen of the
sixth annual Home Show and Building Exposition. Along with Mary Ellen Nichols,
she was a runner-up to the contest winner, Linda Peterson. When she arrived in
California, Bowe secured work as a model. Her measurements were 36-25-36. She
is 5'5" tall and has blue-green eyes. Her modeling agency was contacted by
a high fashion photographer, Christa, who suggested she pose for national and
fashion magazine portraits. Modeling for magazines such as Eye, Tempo, and
Blightly, she eventually made the transition from model to actress in
television. Her magazine credits include a Life Magazine cover. Bowe's look was
at times likened to both Marilyn Monroe and Grace Kelly. She always modeled
high fashion rather than lingerie or bathing suits. She was never asked by
photographers to pose for cheesecake pictures as was many a pin-up girl. She
once said, "Of all the auditions and interviews I have had with casting
men, directors and producers, not one ever made a pass at me. I guess they were
afraid of me." http://louisjsheehan.blogstream.com She resided in
Hollywood starting in 1950. Initially she was signed by film agent Charles
Feldman. When his production plans stalled, she obtained a contract with
Columbia Pictures. She was trained in dramatic acting by Benno Schneider. Her
early experience as an entertainer included performing as a singer and dancer
in amateur musicals. As a screen debutante Bowe appeared in Lovely To Look At (1952)
with Kathryn Grayson and Red Skelton. The 16 beauties showcased include Jane
Lynn, Alma Carroll, Shirley Kimball, Betty Sully, and Honey King. Bowe's part
is uncredited, as is her depiction of a swimmer in Million Dollar Mermaid
(1952). In 1954 she was in the casts of The Golden Mistress and The Adventures
of Hajji Baba. The former was Bowe's first movie after requesting her release
from Columbia. As "Ann Dexter" she was featured opposite John Agar in
an R.K. Productions release, set in Haiti. During filming she almost drowned,
was stung by a sea urchin with three hundred needles, and sustained bumps,
bruises, and insect bites. Bowe was under option to 20th Century Fox when she
filmed The Peacemaker (1956). Based on a novel, the western also featured James
Mitchell. It was released by Hal R. Makelim Productions. Announced in April
1954, the Makelim plan for producing pictures "guaranteed a flow of film
products through a fixed fee system." In 1956 she married Robert Stack.
The couple became the parents of a daughter, Elizabeth Langford Stack, on
January 20, 1957. They shared mutual passions for the outdoors, especially
sailing and riding. Stack enjoyed skeet shooting as his favorite pastime.
Rosemarie temporarily gave up her career when her children were young. In 1970
Bowe had an automobile accident in Sacramento, California in which she
sustained serious internal injuries. She crashed into a concrete culvert
because of a mechanical failure in the rented car she was driving. At the time
Stack was filming The Name of the Game (TV series).
http://sheehan.myblogsite.com He chartered a flight to come and be with her.
Rosemarie Bowe is retired from show business. Her son, Charles Robert Stack, is
also retired. </p> 4436887 2008-07-12 01:02:28 2008-07-12 01:02:28 open
open methane-4436887 publish 0 0 post 0 20646957 wordpress skin
http://wordpress.com/ 127.0.0.1 2015-04-03 05:59:37 2015-04-03 05:59:37
Excellent website I like the structure and quickly responsive technology
utilized in the template your internet site uses. Great work thanks. 1 0 0
experience
http://Louis9J9Sheehan9esquire.blog.ca/2008/07/12/experience-4436865/ Sat, 12
Jul 2008 00:43:59 +0200 Beforethebigbang <p>Whenever a writer is
interviewed or subjected to a Q&A session after a reading, one of the
questions that always comes up has to do with influence. If only we knew who
made the author jealous enough to move him to emulation, a secret would be
revealed and the mysteries of the creative process would be clarified. Such a
curiosity is akin to wanting to trace the lineage of a foundling abandoned one
snowy night on the steps of a convent. Locate the parents and discover the
nature of the child. The question of literary influence itself is a tricky one.
For one thing, it offers the author the opportunity to duck it by substituting
for his actual influences certain names the dropping of which is designed to
impress. Thus, an author may actually choose his parents by devising a more
respectable list of forebears than the stuff that really formed his imagination
or made him reach for a pen. A poet, for instance, might stroke his chin
thoughtfully, look up at the ceiling, as if his influences resided there like
putti, and say "Well, Yeats, of course. And Eliot. We mustn't leave out
Eliot." Another tendency that limits and skews the discussion is that
writers almost invariably stay within their own genre when pressed to identify
influential predecessors. Poets name poets. Novelists nod to other novelists.
But the truth is that influence enters us from all sides. It is the chlorine in
the flood of experience that spills continuously into the conscious mind. A
short-story writer may have been influenced by 18th-century Dutch painting as
much as anything else -- or by his mother's cooking. A painter may have been
marked by her love of album covers or the childhood love of her cousin. And
with that said, I am free to confess that my own poetry would have not
developed in the direction it did, for better or worse, were it not for the
spell that was cast over me as a boy by Warner Bros. cartoons. The very first
time I heard the pulse-quickening blast of the zany theme music by Carl
Stalling -- enough to bring any American boy to attention -- and saw the
colorful bull's-eye emblazoned on the big screen, I was hooked. I think what
these animations offered me besides some very speedy, colorful entertainment
was an alternative to the static reality around me that dutifully followed the
laws of the physical world. The brothers Warner presented a flexible, malleable
world that defied Newton, a world of such plasticity that anything imaginable
was possible. Bugs Bunny could suddenly pull a lawn mower, or anything else
that might come in handy, out of his pants pocket, and he wasn't even wearing
pants. Flattened by a 500-pound anvil, Wile E. Coyote could snap back into
shape in a heartbeat. http://louis0j0sheehan0esquire.blogspot.com A box
containing a pair of Acme rocket-powered roller skates would arrive in the
desert with no sign of a delivery service (though you suspected it would be
called Ace Delivery). Plus, characters could jump dimensions, leaping around in
time and space, their sudden exits marked by a rifle-shot sound effect.
Anticipating the tricks of metafiction, these creatures could hop right out of
the world of the cartoon and into our world, often Hollywood itself to consort
with caricatures of Eddie Cantor and Marilyn Monroe. Or Bugs would do the
impossible by jumping out of the frame and landing on the drawing board of the
cartoonist who was at work creating him. This freedom to transcend the laws of
basic physics, to hop around in time and space, and to skip from one dimension
to another has long been a crucial aspect of imaginative poetry. Robert Bly
developed a poetics based on the notion of psychic "leaping," where
the genius of a poem is measured by its ability to leap without warning from
the conscious to the unconscious and back again. Bly's short poem "After
Long Busyness" provides an example of leaping by association and captures
the skittish motions of thought: I start out for a walk at last after weeks at
the desk. Moon gone, plowing underfoot, no stars; not a trace of light! Suppose
a horse were galloping toward me in this open field? Every day I did not spend
in solitude was wasted. As an early devotee of Looney Tunes cartoons, I was
fascinated by the strange freedoms of these characters, especially their
ability to shape-shift -- like Ovid on speed. Clearly, Bugs Bunny knows as much
about leaping, not to mention whirling, zooming and, of course, hopping, as any
of the great Spanish poets whom Bly credits with the knack of slipping through
walls from one room of the psyche into another. Bugs can be in two places at
once, which he is whenever Elmer Fudd points his shotgun down one of the two
holes of the rabbit's underground residence. And just as Pirandello and other
modern dramatists sought to break down the actor/audience barrier, so Looney
Tunes allowed an animated character to talk directly to the movie house
audience or to criticize the very hand of its animators, thereby betraying the
text itself. In one cartoon which mixes animation with a live action sequence,
Porky Pig barges into producer Leon Schlesinger's office demanding to be let
out of his contract. Another cartoon opens quietly with the figure of Elmer
Fudd in full hunting regalia tip-toeing left to right through the woods. Then,
as if noticing a noisy late-comer to the theater or the sound of a shaken box
of candy, Fudd stops, turns to face the audience, puts one of his four fingers to
his lips and says in a seething whisper: "Shhhh! It's wabbit season."
Ah, Elmer, you unlikely modernist! What were your creators reading? Was
animator Chuck Jones curling up at night with a volume of French surrealist
poetry? When watching cartoons isn't enough, there are plenty of books on the
subject, from historical surveys to scholarly treatments. • Chuck Jones, the
animator behind Looney Tunes, gives behind-thescenes stories in his 1989
memoir, "Chuck Amuck: The Life and Times of an Animated Cartoonist."
For a broader perspective, "Of Mice and Magic: A History of American
Animated Cartoons," written by film critic Leonard Maltin, surveys the
field from its silent-film beginnings through the 1980s. • Studios put a lot of
effort into their early cartoon scores, which incorporated classical music,
popular songs, jazz and opera. In the 2005 "Tunes for 'Toons: Music and
the Hollywood Cartoon," Daniel Goldmark looks at songs written for
animated films from the 1930s to the 1950s. Included is a detailed analysis of
the famous Looney Tunes parody of Wagner, "What's Opera, Doc?" • Animated films have
inspired a number of academic readings, with scholars recently looking at
portrayals of race and gender. Published in February, "The Idea of Nature
in Disney Animation" argues that Disney films have helped shape
perceptions of the environment. The animals in movies like "Bambi"
have especially helped build empathy with the natural world, argues David
Whitley, a lecturer at Cambridge University in the U.K. http://louis5j5sheehan.blogspot.com
•
"The Simpsons" has been a popular cultural studies topic lately.
"The Gospel According to the Simpsons," updated in 2007, examines how
the TV show depicts faith in America. Author Mark Pinsky provides lots of
quotes, including one from Homer who is accidentally hit in the face with an
ice cream cone while he's on a hunger strike. "Nice try, God," he
says, "but Homer Simpson doesn't give in to temptation that easily."
Strange as it may seem, these cartoons also provided me with an education about
things that were not part of the curriculum of a Catholic grammar school of the
1950s. The nuns at St. Joan of Arc in Queens were adroit at teaching me
spelling, geography, and lots of catechism, but Looney Tunes cartoons (despite
their frivolous name) introduced me to much that lay beyond the precincts of a
fairly sheltered childhood. They gave me my first taste of worldliness itself.
As unsophisticated as any nine year old, I had never been to an opera when I
saw Chuck Jones's Wagnerian parody in which Bugs sings Brünnhilde's role in a
blonde wig stuffed under a helmet with horns. The first symphony orchestra I
ever saw was a cartoon one with a fat man playing a tiny flute and a
studious-looking dog with triangle duties -- plus, a conductor wielding a
"baton" and wearing "tails." There I saw my first bassoon.
Before I had ever been to a French restaurant, there on the movie screen was a
canine waiter twirling his mustache and pouring wine for a poodle and his date
at "Café de Paris." I was innocent of undertakers until I saw a large
dog in a black suit measuring Daffy Duck for a coffin. I didn't know what
"running away from home" meant until I saw Porky Pig walking toward
the vanishing point with a stick over his shoulder, a polka dot kerchief tied
to it containing the sum of his material possessions. I'm not sure I knew what
Champagne was until I saw Pepé Le Pew popping a bottle while dressed in smoking
jacket (huh?) and fancy slippers. A bullfight, badminton, a punch-clock, a
barbershop complete with hot-towel cooker and razor strop -- all of these
pieces of the adult world were delivered to me in Technicolor episodes six
minutes long. This was the length that was set as a minimum for a
"short" by movie theatre exhibitors and as a maximum by a frugal Leon
Schlesinger. In the labor-intensive days before digital, one second of film
involved 12 to 24 drawings. A good animator could produce just 15 seconds per
week. In the end, it was the perfect-size package to deliver all this wacky
news. The Mount Rushmore of Warner Bros. cartoons would be composed of the
not-so-solemn faces of Bugs Bunny, Daffy Duck, Porky Pig, and the token human,
Elmer Fudd. As a young viewer, I had no doubts about the superiority of this
gang to the characters of Disney. Disney cartoons were tame, conventional,
Apollonian. Warner Bros.' were manic, unnerving, iconoclastic, spastic,
Dionysian. The most telling difference was that the Disney characters had
romantic partners, spouses, even families of a kind. There was something treacly
about the scenes where Mickey and Minnie's smooches were accompanied by all
those little red hearts floating in the air. Donald had his Daisy and somehow
three nephews even though their parent, the duck's brother or sister, was never
mentioned. The Disney characters were socialized, domesticated, bourgeois.
Warner Bros. characters, with the exception of hen-pecked Porky and his
Petunia, were mavericks -- unregenerate, anti-social. There is no Mrs. Fudd.
And a Mrs. Daffy Duck? Inconceivable. Sex in the Warner toons was more likely
to be transgressive and connected to deception, especially cross-dressing. Bugs
is quick to put on a frock and kiss Elmer on the mouth but only for the purpose
of fooling his perennial victim. Disney-romance led to marriage. Warner
Brothers-romance was linked to guile and aimed at redress.
http://louis2j2sheehan.blogspot.com The late 1920s to the mid-1950s were an
innovative time for animation. Film studios introduced many iconic characters,
and "pretty much every principle that animators use today was
discovered," says animation historian Charles Solomon. Here are some
highlights. My taste for these cartoons would grow into adulthood obsession,
which I shared with a few friends. One fellow addict was Todd McEwen, whose
novel "Arithmetic" ends with a tour-de-force paean to these cartoons,
his language keeping pace with the pictorial speed of animation. My pal Michael
Shannon was not only a fan but a brilliant re-enactor of many famous Looney
Tunes scenes. He and I would habitually visit the Museum of Cartoon Art, then
housed in a castle-like building in Rye, N.Y., where we would ignore Popeye,
Pogo, Archie, and other distractions to sit in an otherwise empty screening
room and order from a menu of Warner Bros. classics. I remember several debates
we had on the directorial merits of Chuck Jones and Friz Freleng, always
arriving at the same conclusion: Freleng's work was energetic and zany, but
Chuck Jones was blessed or cursed with a touch of divine madness. Mr. Jones's
illustrated autobiography, "Chuck Amuck," is peopled by a group of
illustrators and idea-men like Tex Avery, Robert McKimson and Mike "Road
Runner" Maltese, plus musical director Carl Stalling, sound-effects genius
Treg Brown, and, of course, Mel Blanc who did nearly all the voices. Strange to
think of these grown men, usually photographed in dark suits and ties,
gathering in their own shack on the Warner Bros. lot to devise new ways for a
rabbit to hoodwink a duck. But under the zaniness, Mr. Jones saw only human behavior.
As he puts it: "Bugs Bunny is simply...trying to remain alive in a world
of predators; Elmer Fudd considers himself a simple sportsman -- he hunts only
for the "thwill" of it...Wile E. Coyote and Sylvester are simply
trying to get something to eat." And what could be more human than the
allegorical battle of cat and canary? Incidentally, one gem found in his book
is that the actual camera crane used in the animation studios (up to 6,000
drawings had to be photographed per cartoon) was indeed an Acme product. And
speaking of the good people who supplied the hungry coyote -- dinner napkin
hopefully tied around his neck -- with his anvils, TNT plungers, and
helicopter-in-a-backpack, one sign of the unflagging interest in Looney Tunes
is the recent publication of "The Acme Catalog." Now anyone can
purchase a Rocket Sled, a Y-Shaped Branch, or -- my favorite -- Instant Tunnel
Paint. In his introduction, the Vice-President of Customer Service claims that
the business "is guided by a simple two-word philosophy: caveat emptor --
'the customer is always right,' or something." And that is evidence enough
to reassure me that the Looney Tunes flag still flies high -- the unmistakable
bull's-eye and Porky Pig letting us know that that is, indeed, all, folks.
Wilber Hardee, a farm boy turned grill cook who went on to open the first
Hardee’s
hamburger stand in 1960, starting a chain that now has nearly 2,000 restaurants
in the United States and overseas, died Friday at his home in Greenville, N.C.
He was 89. The cause was a heart attack, his daughter Ann Hardee Riggs said. It
was on an empty lot in Greenville, near East Carolina College (now a
university), that Mr. Hardee opened that first hamburger stand on Sept. 3,
1960. There was no dining room, no drive-up window. Charcoal-broiled hamburgers
and milkshakes sold for 15 cents apiece. There are now 1,926 Hardee’s restaurants, mostly
in the Southeast and the Midwest, most of them franchises of CKE Restaurants,
which bought the Hardee’s
chain in 1997. Last year, the Hardee’s division, which specializes in Thickburgers
weighing from one-third to two-thirds of a pound and costing up to $4.49, had
revenue of $1.8 billion. Although he would hold an interest in more than 80
other restaurants during his career, Mr. Hardee did not make much of a profit
as founder of the chain that bears his name. He sold his share in what was then
a five-franchise operation in 1963, for $37,000. “Back in the ’60s, it was pretty
good money,”
Ann Hardee Riggs said, “but
not that much.”
Born in Martin County, N.C., on Aug. 15, 1918, Mr. Hardee was one of five
children of Henry and Mary Hardee. Not interested in the family corn and
tobacco farm, the young Mr. Hardee got a job as a grill cook at a local eatery.
In World War II, he was a Navy cook in the Pacific. While home on furlough in
1945, he married Kathryn Roebuck. http://louisjsheehan.blogspot.com Mr. Hardee’s first wife died in
1980. In 1986, he married Helen Galloway. In addition to his daughter Ann, Mr.
Hardee is survived by his second wife; two daughters from his first marriage,
Mary Baker and Becky Eissens; a stepdaughter, Patricia Phelps; eight
grandchildren; and nine great-grandchildren. After World War II, Mr. Hardee
returned to Greenville and opened a restaurant; he and his wife lived in the
back. By 1960, when he opened his first hamburger stand, Mr. Hardee already
owned 15 restaurants. He took on two partners, Jim Gardner and Leonard Rawls,
in 1961. They opened a second Hardee’s, in Rocky Mount, N.C. But difficulties with his
partners soon led him to sell his share. Mr. Hardee later started another
hamburger chain, called Little Mint, which eventually had about 25 franchised
locations in North and South Carolina. The Hardee’s chain grew by leaps and
bounds in the 1970s, helped in part by its jingle: “Hurry on down to
Hardee’s,
where the burgers are charco-broiled.” Ann Hardee Riggs said her father had never failed
to get a kick out of seeing the red and white sign of the Hardee’s chain. “Anywhere he would go,
he was proud to see his name up there,” she said. Regulators are cracking down on
companies that sell genetic tests directly to consumers, threatening to crimp
the growth of one of the hottest sectors of the biotechnology industry. The
California Department of Public Health sent “cease and desist” letters to 13 genetic testing companies two weeks
ago, telling them they could not solicit business from state residents. The
companies include the early leaders in the field — 23andMe, Navigenics and
deCode Genetics —
which are trying to carve out a new business of offering personal genetic
information for use in health and lifestyle planning. The California action
follows efforts by New York State, which has sent letters to 31 genetic testing
companies since November, saying they need licenses to solicit DNA specimens
from the state’s
residents. Pressure is also mounting for the federal government to take more
action. A report in April by a federal advisory committee said there were
significant gaps in the oversight of genetic tests that could lead to patient
harm. The Department of Health and Human Services will hold a two-day public
meeting July 7 and 8 to discuss regulation of personal genetic information
services. The Federal Trade Commission, meanwhile, has started investigations
into possibly deceptive advertising or marketing of genetic tests, according to
an agency official who spoke at a June 12 meeting convened by Senator Gordon
Smith. The senator, an Oregon Republican, has been prodding federal agencies to
take a stronger stance in overseeing genetic tests sold to consumers. Yet the
move to regulate the tests is raising many issues. What are the standards for
proving a genetic test is valid? Must a doctor always be involved in ordering
such tests to protect patients, or is that an attempt by doctors to protect
their turf? Some of the companies say people have a right to know the
information in their genes and to guide their own health care. “We think your genetic
information is a fundamental part of you,” said Anne Wojcicki, a co-founder of 23andMe. The
company, based in Mountain View, Calif., has attracted attention not only
because of its $1,000 genome testing service but because it is partly financed
by Google and because Ms. Wojcicki is married to the Google co-founder Sergey
Brin. Navigenics and 23andMe say they are not offering medical testing, but
rather personal genetic information services. Using a saliva sample, they scan
a person’s
genome at multiple points looking for variations that might indicate a person
is at a higher than normal risk for certain diseases. “This doesn’t say you have a
disease,”
said Mari Baker, the chief executive of Navigenics, which is based in Redwood
Shores, Calif., and whose service costs $2,500. “It says you carry a genetic
predisposition for the disease and should talk with a health care professional.” But not everyone
agrees with that rationale. “We think if you’re telling people you have increased risk of
adverse health effects, that’s medical advice,” said Ann Willey, director
of the office of laboratory policy and planning at the New York State
Department of Health. Genetic tests that are developed by clinical laboratories
generally do not require approval by the Food and Drug Administration before
they can be marketed. http://louis5j5sheehan5.blogspot.com The laboratories
themselves are regulated by the Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services.
Such regulation is meant to ensure that laboratories are proficient and that
the tests are “analytically
valid.”
That means that if a test purports to detect a particular genetic variation, it
does so reliably. But critics say such regulation does not assure that tests
are “clinically
valid”
—
that having a particular genetic variation actually means a person has a
disease or is at risk for one. Critics also say many tests now being sold to
consumers are not backed by adequate scientific studies. The California
letters, sent on June 9 and 10, said the companies needed to have state
licenses as clinical laboratories. In addition, they said, genetic tests could
be ordered only by a doctor, not by consumers. “We started this week by no
longer tolerating direct-to-consumer genetic testing in California,” Karen L. Nickel,
chief of laboratory field services for the state health department, said during
a June 13 meeting of a state advisory committee on clinical laboratories. Lea
Brooks, a spokeswoman for the health department, said the letters were sent in
response to consumer complaints about the cost and accuracy of the tests. Most
of the attention so far has focused on Navigenics and 23andMe because of their
high profiles and the fact that they acknowledged getting the state’s letters. The
identities of most of the other recipients were unknown until Tuesday, when the
state health department posted all 13 letters on its Web site. The other
recipients include Knome, which is offering to do a complete sequence of a
person’s
genome for $350,000. Also on the list were a few companies that give diet
advice based on a person’s
genes (and in some cases also sell dietary supplements). There were also some
companies that offer genetic tests for single conditions, like the risk of
baldness or Alzheimer’s
disease. The companies had until this Monday or Tuesday to respond to the
agency, which will now review the responses. At least one company that received
a letter, Sciona, has stopped offering its gene testing and related diet advice
to residents of California and New York. DeCode’s Web site indicates that
certain calculations of disease risk will not be available to residents of New
York, California and several other states. But Navigenics and 23andMe say they
believe they comply with the regulations and are continuing to accept samples
from Californians. Navigenics has stopped accepting orders from New York while
its laboratory seeks a state license. But 23andMe said it continues to accept
orders from New York. Both companies say they do not need a license from
California because the genome scans are actually performed by outside
laboratories that do have state licenses. Navigenics said its tests are ordered
by a physician because a doctor on contract to the company reviews customer
orders before the specimens are passed to the testing laboratory. But Kathy
Hudson, director of the Genetics and Public Policy Center at Johns Hopkins
University, said that “some
doc on the payroll at Genes R Us” is not the same as a personal physician. Dr.
Hudson said it was “not
surprising that the states are stepping in, in an effort to protect consumers,
because there has been a total absence of federal leadership.” She said that if the
federal government assured tests were valid, “paternalistic” state laws could be
relaxed “to
account for smart, savvy consumers” intent on playing a greater role in their own
health care. Lara Logan, the CBS News chief foreign correspondent who deplored
the lack of media coverage of Iraq and Afghanistan last week, will no longer be
based overseas, the network said on Wednesday. Ms. Logan, who has covered both
wars extensively for CBS, will be based in Washington, with a new title: chief
foreign affairs correspondent. The position will probably give Ms. Logan,
considered a rising star within CBS News, with more airtime on the “CBS Evening News” and “60 Minutes.” “She will still travel
all over the world, but she will based in Washington instead of London,” said Sean McManus,
the president of CBS News. “She will still periodically cover the war in Iraq,
and she will still cover international stories.”
http://louis4j4sheehan4.blogspot.com Ms. Logan’s guest appearance on Comedy
Central’s
“Daily
Show”
on June 17 caught some viewers — and also some CBS staffers — off guard. Speaking
to the host, Jon Stewart, she used colorful language to complain about how
little airtime the broadcast networks devote to war reporting. CBS News
recently stopped assigning a full-time correspondent to Iraq, becoming the
first American network to do so. Ms. Logan hyperbolically described how she
demands to put her war stories onto television and said she would “blow her brains out” if she watched American
news coverage. As heretical as her remarks may have come across, her appearance
on the show had been booked by CBS News, and executives said Ms. Logan had not
been reprimanded for her comments. Her new assignment has been planned for
weeks, they said. Ms. Logan will cover foreign affairs, international security
issues and United States policy, somewhat filling the role of State Department
correspondent, which has been vacant for years. On Wednesday Mr. McManus was
hesitant to label the move a promotion, instead calling it “an expansion of her
role and an opportunity to get her on our CBS broadcasts more often.” Ms. Logan signed a
multiyear renewal of her CBS contract last winter. In an interview last week
she said CBS News officials have supported her international reporting. “They wish me well,
they give me whatever I need, and I’m gone,” she said. Like any foreign correspondent, she said
she would like more coverage of the world on television newscasts. “I would like there to
be more coverage of the wars,” she said. “I’d like there to be more money to have a bureau in
Afghanistan as well as in Iraq. I’d like to see Zimbabwe on the air. That’s part of what my job
is, to fight for those things.” In extensive study of bird genetics has revealed
so many surprises about avian evolution that researchers say textbooks and
field guides will have to be rewritten. After comparing the genetic codes of
169 species researchers realized that many assumptions about bird evolution are
wrong; for example, they found that falcons are not closely related to hawks
and eagles, and that flamingos didn’t evolve from other waterbirds. “With this study, we
learned two major things,”
said Sushma Reddy, lead author and a fellow at The Field Museum in Chicago,
Illinois. “First,
appearances can be deceiving. Birds that look or act similar are not
necessarily related. Second, much of bird classification and conventional
wisdom on the evolutionary relationships of birds is wrong” . Scientists believe
birds, which first appeared roughly 150 million years ago, evolved from small
feathered carnivorous dinosaurs. “Modern birds as we know them evolved really
rapidly, probably within a few million years, into all of the forms we see.
That happened 65 to 100 million years ago,” Reddy said in a telephone interview. Reddy said
these quick changes have made bird evolution hard to pin down. The study, which
appears in the journal Science [subscription required], divides birds into
three major groups: land birds, like the sparrow; water birds, like the diving
penguin; and shore birds, like the seagull. But in a surprising result, the
genetic analysis revealed that shorebirds evolved later, which refutes the
widely held view that shorebirds gave rise to all modern birds [Telegraph]. The
study also suggests that distinctive lifestyles, like hunting from the air in
the case of falcons and eagles, evolved several times during avian history. In
another example, researchers say that flamingos didn’t evolve from other
wading birds, but instead from a land-based bird that adapted to coastal
living. The bird project was part of a larger, federally funded effort called
Assembling the Tree of Life, which aims to trace the evolutionary origins of
all living things, from marine bacteria to domesticated corn and Australian
snakes. 1 This list is about black gold. Texas tea. Petroleum, or crude oil.
Which is in no way related to the oils we eat or excrete. 2 If you are a
creationist, crude oil was formed by thousands of years of heat and pressure
applied to the carcasses of plants and animals that died in the Great Flood. If
you’re
not, you think oil comes from dinosaurs, right? 3 Wrong. Almost all oil comes
from pressure-cooking dead zooplankton and algae—pond scum, in other words—which are among the
oldest and most abundant life forms on earth.
http://louis2j2sheehan2esquire2.blogspot.com 4 Don’t blame the Hummers.
That pond scum ultimately produced trillions upon trillions of gallons of oil.
But most of it bubbled up to the surface long ago and was consumed by greedy
bacteria. 5 Oil companies seek the small fraction that remains, spending more
than $150 billion a year hunting for new reserves. 6 Fashion march of the
penguins: Thousands of tiny, colorful sweaters have been knit for these
flightless birds, to keep them from preening themselves if they are doused in
oil from a spill. 7 When you buy gasoline, you might want to make your purchase
at night—it
will be cheaper. Gasoline becomes more dense in cooler temperatures, and gas
pumps measure gas by volume. 8 A tip for trippers: Keep your windows closed at
high speeds—drag
from open windows can reduce a car’s fuel efficiency by 10 percent. 9 Neatness counts
too: Cleaning 100 pounds of junk from your car will get you up to 2 percent
more miles per gallon. 10 Another trip tip: Instead of taking a break for lunch
at a restaurant, cook food on your engine. Find out how (and get a recipe for
Hyundai Halibut With Fennel) in the classic book Manifold Destiny. 11 The
recipe for gasoline itself is complex. Depending on the blend, it can contain
between 150 and 1,000 different chemical compounds. 12 Tighten your gas cap. A
leaking or missing cap can release 30 gallons of fuel per year into the
atmosphere. 13 In California alone, vapors from gas stations account for enough
gasoline to fill two tanker trucks every day. 14 Speaking of tankers, that
truck you’re
trying to pass may be carrying 4,000 gallons of gas, which, if in a crash, can
explode with the energy of 200 tons of TNT. 15 By the eighth century, a
petroleum industry already existed in the Middle East. The streets of Baghdad
were paved with tar derived from petroleum. 16 In oil-rich Baku, Azerbaijan,
north of Iran, villagers could once dig a hole in the ground with their hands,
drop in a live coal, and start a fire. 17 In the United States, when people
first noticed oil, they didn’t quite grasp the energy angle. Instead they did
what any industrious American would do: They bottled it, slapped a label on,
and sold it as a health tonic. 18 Several hundred thousand bottles of the stuff
are said to have been purchased and, perhaps, consumed. 19 Since they moved on
from the health drink angle, Americans have laid down 161,000 miles of fuel
pipeline in the United States. That’s more than half the distance to the moon. 20 Spies
like pipelines. http://www.soulcast.com/Louis_J_Sheehan_Esquire_1 E ngineers
use a robotic device known as a smart pig to inspect pipelines from the inside.
Two James Bond movies so far have made oil pipelines and pigs part of the plot:
The Living Daylights and The World Is Not Enough. You will have to wait until
November to see if the pattern is repeated in the next Bond installment,
Quantum of Solace. Hypnosis, ("sleep") is often thought to be "a
trance-like state that resembles sleep but is induced by a person whose
suggestions are readily accepted by the subject." The technique is
sometimes used for medical purposes to relieve anxiety or otherwise improve or
alter behavior. Its effectiveness has been clinically demonstrated in many
areas, most notably in the area of accute pain relief. It is also used in
popular stage acts in which subjects are persuaded to perform bizarre feats.
Other variations include so-called "mass-hypnosis," in which crowds
are simultaneously influenced, and autosuggestion in which subjects persuade
themselves. However, these phenomena are unlike those typically associated with
the classical phenomena of hypnosis. Although we can speak of a "history
of hypnosis" prior to the 19th century, it should be clear that the word
itself is the invention of 19th century Scottish physician James Braid. It is
not clear if what is discussed as hypnosis prior to the 19th century in
histories of hypnosis is in actual fact what we mean today by
"hypnosis." During the Middle Ages and early modern period, hypnosis
began to be better understood by physicians such as Avicenna (Ibn Sina).
Hypnotic susceptibility is the measurable responsiveness that a person has to
hypnosis. Not all people can be hypnotized, but about 10% of people respond
exceptionally well.There is little evidence linking susceptibility to
intelligence or personality traits, but some research has linked hypnosis to
the amount of imagination in subjects. Recent research suggests that highly
hypnotizable people have high sensory and perceptual gating abilities that
allow them to block some stimuli from awareness. There is a common claim that
no one can be hypnotized against his will. The American Society of Clinical
Hypnosis's web site says "Hypnosis is a state of inner absorption, concentration
and focused attention." It often appears as if the hypnotized participant
accepts the authority of the hypnotist over his or her own experience. When
asked after the conclusion of such a session, some participants claim to be
genuinely unable to recall the incident, while others say that they had known
the hypnotist was wrong but at the time it had seemed easier just to go along
with his instructions. (Richard Feynman describes this, in his memoir Surely
You're Joking, Mr. Feynman!, as his own hypnotic experience.) The esoteric
publication Hypnotism, by Danish hypnotist Carl Septus, is an early reference
work that notes the absence of the pupillary reflex sign. Septus states
specifically that after subjects have been asked to open their eyes during a
deep trance, light shone into the eyes does not cause pupil contraction. The
hypnotist may use suggestion to keep the subject in hypnosis, but must avoid
suggestions relating to eyes, visual focus, light, or the dilation or
contraction of the pupils. Hypnotherapy is a term to describe the use of
hypnosis in a therapeutic context. Many hypnotherapists refer to their practice
as "clinical work". Hypnotherapy can either be used as an addition to
the work of licensed physicians or psychologists, or it can be used in a
stand-alone environment where the hypnotherapist in question usually owns his
or her own business. The majority of these stand-alone certified
hypnotherapists (C.Hts in the U.S., Diploma. Hyp or DHP in the UK) today earn a
large portion of their income through the cessation of smoking (often in a
single session) and the aid of weight loss (body sculpting) and possibly
anorexia[citation needed]. Psychologists and psychiatrists use hypnosis
predominantly for the treatment of dissociative disorders, phobias, habit
change, depression and post-traumatic syndromes.There is no evidence that
'incurable' diseases (such as cancer, diabetes, and arthritis) are curable with
hypnosis, but pain and other bodily symptoms related to the diseases are
controllable.Some of the treatments practiced by hypnotherapists, in particular
so-called regression, have been viewed with skepticism. The American Medical
Association and the American Psychological Association have both cautioned
against the use of repressed memory therapy in dealing with cases of alleged
childhood trauma, stating that "it is impossible, without other
corroborative evidence, to distinguish a true memory from a false one",
and so the procedure is "fraught with problems of potential misapplication".
In a lecture to the American Society of Clinical Hypnosis (ASCH) during their
annual conference at the State University Of New York, Dr. Milton Erickson
taught the process of indirect hypnosis while Dr. Robert W. Habbick spoke of
his research on the use of hypnosis in enhancing learning and reducing anxiety.
Dr. Habbick explained the use of a triad of suggestions: "(a) enhancing
confidence, while (b) strengthening focused interest in the work and (c)
improving energy to do the studying necessary." The results of his controlled
research pointed the way toward the need to apply hypnosis especially with
students who have difficulty studying. In a more recent lecture, Dr. Habbick
spoke in Boston to ASCH of the positive effects of using his suggested hypnosis
triad with students at the Bureau of Study Council at Harvard University.
Hypnodermatology is the practice of treating skin diseases with hypnosis. A
study done at the Mt. Sinai School of Medicine looked at two groups of patients
facing surgery for breast cancer. The group that received hypnosis prior to
surgery reported less pain, nausea, and anxiety after surgery than did the
control group. There was a cost benefit as well, as the average hypnosis
patient reduced the cost of treatment by an average of $772.00. In April 2008 a
professional hypnotist, Alex Lenkei, successfully hypnotised himself before
having surgery on his hand and was in no pain throughout the 80 minute
operation. His blood pressure and heart rate were also monitored and remained
normal, indicating that he truly did not experience any pain. An anaesthetist
who remained on hand believes Mr Lenkei's body may have released chemicals
which blocked pain. Michael R. Nash writes, in a july 2001 article for
Scientific American titled "The Truth and the Hype of Hypnosis",
"using hypnosis, scientists have temporarily created hallucinations,
compulsions, certain types of memory loss, false memories, and delusions in the
laboratory so that these phenomena can be studied in a controlled
environment." In his book The Hidden Persuaders (1957) Vance Packard
describes research involving the behavior of housewives in supermarkets in the
1950s. Cameras were hidden to measure a shopper's eye-blink rate as she
compared items. It was assumed that her eye-blink rate would increase as she
performed mental calculations to determine which product was the best value. In
fact, the cameras recorded an eye-blink rate which indicated that the housewife
was, according to Packard, usually in a hypnotic state while shopping. This led
manufacturers to produce new brands of laundry detergent in competition with
their own, existing brands, where the primary differences were in the product
names, colors and shapes of designs on the packages, which were designed to
appeal to women at different times of their menstrual cycles. The effects of
this research can be noted today by visiting the laundry detergent section of
any American supermarket. Hypnotism has also received publicity about its use
in Forensics, Sports, Education, and physical therapy and rehabilitation.
Though various conjectures are made about hypnosis, the field has received
significant support from the science-oriented psychology community due to
research into hypnotic phenomena conducted by practitioners and theorists (Sala
1999). http://louis_j_sheehan.today.com Both Heap and Dryden (1991) and Ambrose
and Newbold (1980) consider that the theoretical debates on hypnotherapy have
been productive, and that hypnosis has benefited from the attentions of those
involved in the controversies, and conversely, that the developments of
neurolinguistic programming and neo-Ericksonian hypnosis has been characterized
by gullibility and fraudulence. Social constructionism and role-playing theory
of hypnosis, discovered by Jun Zhou in the early 18th century,[23] suggests
that individuals are playing a role and that really there is no such thing as
hypnosis. A relationship is built depending on how much rapport has been
established between the "hypnotist" and the subject (see Hawthorne effect,
Pygmalion effect, and placebo effect). Some psychologists, such as Robert Baker
and Graham Wagstaff, claim that what we call hypnosis is actually a form of
learned social behavior, a complex hybrid of social compliance, relaxation, and
suggestibility that can account for many esoteric behavioral manifestations.
Nicholas Spanos states, "hypnotic procedures influence behavior indirectly
by altering subjects' motivations, expectations and interpretations."
Pierre Janet originally developed the idea of dissociation of consciousness as
a result of his work with hysterical patients. He believed that hypnosis was an
example of dissociation whereby areas of an individual's behavioral control are
split off from ordinary awareness. Hypnosis would remove some control from the
conscious mind and the individual would respond with autonomic, reflexive
behavior. Weitzenhoffer describes hypnosis via this theory as
"dissociation of awareness from the majority of sensory and even strictly
neural events taking place." Anna Gosline says in a NewScientist.com
article: "Gruzelier and his colleagues studied brain activity using an
fMRI while subjects completed a standard cognitive exercise, called the Stroop
task. The team screened subjects before the study and chose 12 that were highly
susceptible to hypnosis and 12 with low susceptibility. They all completed the
task in the fMRI under normal conditions and then again under hypnosis.
Throughout the study, both groups were consistent in their task results,
achieving similar scores regardless of their mental state. During their first
task session, before hypnosis, there were no significant differences in brain
activity between the groups. But under hypnosis, Gruzelier found that the
highly susceptible subjects showed significantly more brain activity in the
anterior cingulate gyrus than the weakly susceptible subjects. This area of the
brain has been shown to respond to errors and evaluate emotional outcomes. The
highly susceptible group also showed much greater brain activity on the left side
of the prefrontal cortex than the weakly susceptible group. This is an area
involved with higher level cognitive processing and behaviour." Ivan
Pavlov believed that hypnosis was a "partial sleep". He observed that
the various degrees of hypnosis did not significantly differ physiologically
from the waking state and hypnosis depended on insignificant changes of
environmental stimuli. Pavlov also suggested that lower-brain-stem mechanisms
were involved in hypnotic conditioning. Currently a more popular "hyper-suggestibility
theory" states that the subject focuses attention by responding to the
hypnotist's suggestion. As attention is focused and magnified, the hypnotist's
words are gradually accepted without the subject conducting any conscious
censorship of what is being said. This is not unlike the athlete listening to
the coach's last pieces of advice minutes before an important sport event;
concentration filters out all that is unimportant and magnifies what is said
about what really matters to the subject. An approach loosely based on
Information theory uses a brain-as-computer model. In adaptive systems, a
system may use feedback to increase the signal-to-noise ratio, which may
converge towards a steady state. Increasing the signal-to-noise ratio enables
messages to be more clearly received from a source. The hypnotist's object is
to use techniques to reduce the interference and increase the receptability of
specific messages (suggestions). Systems theory, in this context, may be
regarded as an extension of James Braid's original conceptualization of
hypnosis[32][page # needed] as involving a process of enhancing or depressing
the activity of the nervous system. Systems theory considers the nervous
system's organization into interacting subsystems. Hypnotic phenomena thus
involve not only increased or decreased activity of particular subsystems, but
also their interaction. A central phenomenon in this regard is that of feedback
loops, familiar to systems theory, which suggest a mechanism for creating the more
extreme hypnotic phenomena. A peer-reviewed article on the University of
Maryland Medical Center's web site says: "Although studies on hypnosis as
a treatment for obesity are not conclusive, most research suggests that
hypnotherapy (when used in combination with cognitive behavioral therapy,
exercise, and a low-fat diet) may help overweight or obese individuals lose
weight." In 1996, the National Institutes of Health technology assessment
panel judged hypnosis to be an effective intervention for alleviating pain from
cancer and other chronic conditions. A large number of clinical studies also
indicate that hypnosis can reduce the acute pain experienced by patients
undergoing burn-wound debridement, enduring bone marrow aspirations, and
childbirth. An analysis published in a recent issue the International Journal
of Clinical and Experimental Hypnosis, for example, found that hypnotic
suggestions relieved the pain of 75% of 933 subjects participating in 27
different experiments. http://Louis-j-sheehan-esquire.us One controlled
scientific experiment postulates that hypnosis may alter our perception of
conscious experience in a way not possible when people are not
"hypnotized", at least in "highly hypnotizable" people. In
this experiment, color perception was changed by hypnosis in "highly
hypnotizable" people as determined by (PET) scans (Kosslyn et al., 2000).
Another research example, employing event-related functional MRI (fMRI) and EEG
coherence measures, compared certain specific neural activity "...during
Stroop task performance between participants of low and high hypnotic
susceptibility, at baseline and after hypnotic induction". According to
its authors, "the fMRI data revealed that conflict-related ACC activity
interacted with hypnosis and hypnotic susceptibility, in that highly
susceptible participants displayed increased conflict-related neural activity
in the hypnosis condition compared to baseline, as well as with respect to
subjects with low susceptibility." (Egner et al., 2005) Michael Nash said
in a Scientific American article: "In 1998 Henry Szechtman of McMaster
University in Ontario and his co-workers used PET to image the brain activity
of hypnotized subjects who were invited to imagine a scenario and who then
experienced a hallucination ... By monitoring regional blood flow in areas
activated during both hearing and auditory hallucination but not during simple
imagining, the investigators sought to determine where in the brain a
hallucinated sound is mistakenly "tagged" as authentic and originating
in the outside world. Szechtman and his colleagues imaged the brain activity of
eight very hypnotizable subjects who had been prescreened for their ability to
hallucinate under hypnosis ... The tests showed that a region of the brain
called the right anterior cingulate cortex was just as active while the
volunteers were hallucinating as it was while they were actually hearing the
stimulus. In contrast, that brain area was not active while the subjects were
imagining that they heard the stimulus." Self-hypnosis (or autosuggestion)
—
is hypnosis in which a person hypnotizes himself or herself without the
assistance of another person to serve as the hypnotist — is a staple of
hypnotherapy-related self-help programs. It is most often used to help the
self-hypnotist stay on a diet, overcome smoking or some other addiction, or to
generally boost the hypnotized person's self-esteem. It is rarely used for the
more complex or controversial uses of hypnosis, which require the hypnotist to
monitor the hypnotized person's reactions and responses and respond
accordingly. Most people who practice self-hypnosis require a focus in order to
become fully hypnotized; there are many computer programs on the market that
can ostensibly help in this area, though few, if any, have been scientifically
proven to aid self-hypnosis. Some people use devices known as mind machines to
help them go into self-hypnosis more readily. http://louis-j-sheehan.net A mind
machine consists of glasses with different colored flashing LEDs on the inside,
and headphones. The LEDs stimulate the visual channel, while the headphones
stimulate the audio channel with similar or slightly different frequencies
designed to produce a certain mental state. The use of binaural beats in the
audio is common; it is said to produce hypnosis more readily. Self-hypnosis is
a skill that can be improved as time goes by. People use techniques such as
imagining walking down 10 steps, feeling deeper relaxed as they imagine slowly
walking down each step, one at a time. It is a good idea to initially seek the
skills of a practicing hypnotherapist in order to understand what it feels like
to be in a hypnotic trance. This greatly helps, as the individual can aim to
replicate this state. Alternatively, a person may wish to use hypnosis
recordings instead. This phenomenon, as expounded by Melvin Powers in 1955,
involves altering the behavior of a subject by suggestion without inducing a
trance. Related to the placebo effect, a subject becomes subconsciously
convinced that what they are being told is inevitable reality, for example that
the air in the room will cause them to swallow. They can be convinced that a
completely benign substance is actually a drug that will induce whatever effect
is suggested. In order to work, the subject must completely trust the source of
the suggestion or be subconsciously convinced by a calm authoritative tone.
Influencing crowds through common longings and yearnings by a demagogue is
called mass hypnosis. Generally, mass hypnosis is applied to religious
sessions. Many forms of music and dance can be used to create religious trance.
In addition to direct application of hypnosis (that is, treatment of conditions
by means of hypnosis), there is also indirect application, wherein hypnosis is
used to facilitate another procedure. Some people seem more able to display
"enhanced functioning", such as the suppression of pain, while
utilizing hypnosis. Robin Waterfield writes, in his 2002 book Hidden Depths:
The Story of Hypnosis, "a person can act, some time later, on a suggestion
seeded during the hypnotic session. Post-hypnotic suggestions can last for a
long time. http://louis-j-sheehan.com A hypnotherapist told one of his
patients, who was also a friend: 'When I touch you on the finger you will
immediately be hypnotized.' Fourteen years later, at a dinner party, he touched
him deliberately on the finger and his head fell back against the chair."
http://louis-j-sheehan.com Pratt et al., write, in their 1988 book A Clinical
Hypnosis Primer, "A hypnotized patient will respond to a suggestion
literally. A suggestion that requires conscious interpretation can have
undesirable effects." They give the following report taken from Hartland,
1971, p.37: "A patient who was terrified to go into the street because of
the traffic was once told by a hypnotist that when she left his room, she would
no longer bother about the traffic and would be able to cross the road without
the slightest fear. She obeyed his instructions so literally that she ended up
in a hospital." In one case, a woman had experienced 10 years of fatigue,
irritability, and periods of childish behavior during which her perceptions
were distorted. The source of the problem was traced back to a stage
performance 10 years earlier, when she was regressed to a traumatic period of
her life. From Kleinhauz and Eli, 1987: In one case, a dentist using
hypnorelaxation with a patient complied with her request to provide direction
suggestions to stop smoking. The patient's underlying psychological conflicts,
which the dentist was not qualified to assess, led to the development of an
anxiety/depressive reaction. From Machovec, 1987: A woman undergoing
psychotherapy facilitated by hypnosis attempted to use the procedures she had
learned to relieve her husband's dental pain. During the deepening technique of
arm levitation, her husband's fingertips 'stuck' to his head, and a therapist
had to intervene to end the trance state."
http://Louis2J2Sheehan2Esquire.US Subjects have been known to cry or suffer a
mental breakdown after extended periods of being in a trance like state of
mind.[citation needed] False memory obtained via hypnosis has figured
prominently in many investigations and court cases, including cases of alleged
sexual abuse. There is no scientific way to prove that any of these
recollections are completely accurate. The American Medical Association and the
American Psychological Association have both cautioned against the use of
repressed memory therapy in dealing with cases of alleged childhood trauma,
stating that "it is impossible, without other corroborative evidence, to
distinguish a true memory from a false one", and so the procedure is
"fraught with problems of potential misapplication". Some believe
that hypnosis is a form of mind control and/or brainwashing that can control a
person's behavior and judgment and therefore could potentially cause them harm.
These beliefs are not generally based on scientific evidence, as there is no
scientific consensus on whether mind control even exists. But there are people interested
in research and funding to help work on controlling others and perfecting mind
control techniques. These techniques can be researched with the scientific
method and reasoning skills. From the mental standpoint, a hypnotic subject is
relaxed yet alert and always aware at some level. Some choose to think of this
as a state of mind called "trance". Due to the popular but incorrect
notion of hypnosis as mind control, some people believe that the ability to
experience hypnosis is related to strength and soundness of mind. However,
scientists note that personality traits such as gullibility or submissiveness
or factors such as low intelligence are not related to hypnotize-ability.
Research studies suggest that none of intelligence, gender, or personality
traits (ref: below ...overactive imagination...) affect responsiveness to
hypnosis and that hypnotize-ability may in fact be hereditary or genetic in
nature. http://Louis2J2Sheehan2Esquire.US Another misconception in popular
culture is that hypnosis is often the product of vivid imaginations and that
hypnotic phenomena are merely imagined in the mind. However, research indicates
many imaginative people do not fare well as good hypnotic subjects. (Ref above:
...No personality traits...) Furthermore, studies using PET scans have shown
that hypnotized subjects suggested to have auditory hallucinations demonstrated
regional blood flow in the same areas of the brain as real hearing, whereas
subjects merely imagining hearing noise did not. It is a misconception that
induction into hypnosis is time-consuming and requires complete relaxation.
Hypnosis through lengthy relaxation or visual experiences is the most common
form of induction, but instant inductions (2-10 seconds) is a method for
induction or re-induction among stage hypnotists, as well as clinical
hypnotists seeking to manage trauma or overcome anxiety and resistance. Authors
John Cerbone and Richard Nongard refer to this phenomena as Speed-Trance,
noting it is possible to hypnotize a subject in just a few seconds by causing
confusion, loss of equilibrium, misdirection, shock, or eye fixation. However,
the duration of time it takes to induce hypnosis does not always take into
consideration the depth of trance that is secured. [Due to the stage hypnotist's
showmanship and their perpetuating the illusion of possessing mysterious
abilities, hypnosis is often seen as caused by the hypnotist's power. The real
power of hypnosis comes from the trust the hypnotist can instill in his
subjects. They have to willingly grant him the ability to take over their
critical thinking and direct their bodies. Some people are very trusting, or
even looking for an excuse to abdicate their responsibilities and are able to
be hypnotized within seconds, while others take more time to counter their
fears. In a stage hypnosis situation the hypnotist chooses his participants
carefully. First he gives the entire audience a few exercises to perform and
plants ideas in their minds, such as, only intelligent people can be hypnotized
and only those wanting to
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
No comments:
Post a Comment